mirror of
https://github.com/Zygo/bees.git
synced 2025-05-17 21:35:45 +02:00
de9d72da80
Suppose Task A, B, and C are created in that order, and currently running.
Task T acquires Exclusion E. Task B, A, and C attempt to acquire the
same Exclusion, in that order, but fail because Task T holds it.
The result is Task T with a post-exec queue:
T, [ B, A, C ] sort_requested
Now suppose Task U acquires Exclusion F, then Task T attempts to acquire
Exclusion F. Task T fails to acquire F, so T is inserted into U's
post-exec queue. The result at the end of the execution of T is a tree:
U, [ T ] sort_requested
\-> [ B, A, C ] sort_requested
Task T exits after failing to acquire a lock. When T exits, T will
sort its post-exec queue and submit the post-exec queue for execution
immediately:
Worker 1: U, [ T ] sort_requested
Worker 2: A, B, C
This isn't ideal because T, A, B, and C all depend on at least one
common Exclusion, so they are likely to immediately conflict with T
when U exits and T runs again.
Ideally, A, B, and C would at least remain in a common queue with T,
and ideally that queue is sorted.
Instead of inserting T into U's post-exec queue, insert T and all
of T's post-exec queue, which creates a single flattened Task list:
U, [ T, B, A, C ] sort_requested
Then when U exits, it will sort [ T, B, A, C ] into [ A, B, C, T ],
and run all of the queued Tasks in age priority order:
U exited, [ T, B, A, C ] sort_requested
U exited, [ A, B, C, T ]
[ A, B, C, T ] on TaskConsumer queue
Signed-off-by: Zygo Blaxell <bees@furryterror.org>